Spring 2019 Chapter 1 Notes:
What
Actually IS Philosophy?
Study of Thoughts
Broadly the study of the "nature of knowledge" reality, existence, reason, values, beauty, time causation, language, government.
-Specifically could be the study of the above as applied to anything – i.e. – the philosophy of Science, History, or business …………. Or bowling, hunting, or quilting.
Philosophy may or may not be done as an academic discipline.
Academic Philosophy: You study it in college
Practical Philosophy: The art of applying philosophical skills to normal problems.
Growing Need for critical thinking skills in 2019. It used to be "here's the job, do it" Now it might often be, "here's what we want, create it".
Study of Thoughts
Broadly the study of the "nature of knowledge" reality, existence, reason, values, beauty, time causation, language, government.
-Specifically could be the study of the above as applied to anything – i.e. – the philosophy of Science, History, or business …………. Or bowling, hunting, or quilting.
Philosophy may or may not be done as an academic discipline.
Academic Philosophy: You study it in college
Practical Philosophy: The art of applying philosophical skills to normal problems.
Growing Need for critical thinking skills in 2019. It used to be "here's the job, do it" Now it might often be, "here's what we want, create it".
-Philosophy has a Critical
Attitude – one of Questioning.
-Seeking
Truth: Can be Skeptical, yet
Open-Minded.
-Having “Rational Disinteredness”. A good referee has this. A bad referee gets sucked into the game.
Philosophy and being Practical.
-See All Options to a problem, not just what society has conditioned you
to see.
-Think outside the Box, but in a structured way.
-Questions absolutely everything, but in a respectful way.
-To see the Other Perspectives and Other People’s Perspectives.
-A Key to understand how other people might think.
-A Key to understand what might be motivating someone or someone’s actions.
-It is possible to see philosophy in almost everything.
-It helps you to try to see it through the eye of the critic, regardless
of how basic they might
seem, or how irrational they might seem.
The ability to question, reason, negotiate,
pass rational, logical mostly non-emotional judgment, and to continuously weigh
options pays big bucks and is in large demand.
-There is no
mystical value to philosophy, but it can be therapeutically good for a person.
-Philosophy
“can” help a person to rise above his/her own cultural bias/acceptance.
-Values and one’s philosophy are
connected. Thought and action are
connected.
-It is possible for an entire
culture to develop a philosophy that is generally not
acceptable.
: Nazi Germany
: American Slavery
-Philosophy
can help a person understand that everyone has bias to a degree, some more than
others.
-Author
suggests Philosophy is practical for understanding assimilation of
Technology/21st Century Skills.
-Oracle of
Delphi: Know Thyself.
Philosophy’s Body of Knowledge
-Philosophy has a body of
knowledge like any other academic discipline such as math, or history.
-Philosophy has different opinions: For example: All knowledge must be rational and come from a-priori principles (Descartes), or there are no a-priori principles therefore all Knowledge must be based on experience, and therefore the most we can hope for is a feeling of what might be true (Hume).
-Some argue that philosophy was the first body of knowledge.
-Philosophy’s
Body of Knowledge is sometimes cultural:
-Western Philosophy: Based on Greeks and Romans.
-Eastern Philosophy: Based on Eastern
Culture and Eastern Religions.
-Philosophy’s
Body of Knowledge has various directions that have similar themes: The main veins of philosophy are:
-Metaphysics - Purpose -
anything that deals with purpose
-Epistemology – Knowing - Anything that deals with “How do we
know what we know”? Epistemology
sometimes does not deal with metaphysics.
Epistemology often asks the question of whether we know by experience or
by innate truths.
-Ethics -Right
and Wrong:
-Logic -Making Sense:
In a sequential and rational way.
-Aesthetics -Beauty: Asks the question of what beauty actually
is.
-Each of
these themes have various dimensions, and can then have depth from that
dimension – or a “body of knowledge within the body of knowledge”. Example:
Calculus requires an understanding of Trigonometry which is related to
Mathematics. Logical Positivism requires
an understanding of Empiricism, which is related to Philosophy.
-Philosophy
has basic “themes” that are “perennial” (come back again and again)
-Is human action pre-determined or not, or both and to what degree? (A metaphysical
-Is human action pre-determined or not, or both and to what degree? (A metaphysical
argument)
-Is knowledge based on known
truths and rationalized from there, or do we experience
all knowledge? (An
epistemological argument)
-What is good conduct and how
should we therefore live? (Ethical)
-Is human purpose to: Have Fun, be dutiful, be kind, all of the
above or none of the
above? (Metaphysical)
-Philosophy DOES have an element of religion, but is it one of many
elements.
-What is beauty, and is there
such a thing as pure beauty? (Aesthetic)
-What is “good” What is “just”
What is “truth”? (Aesthetic and Metaphysical)
-What is our responsibility, if
any, to the state?
Other Large Commonly Studies Veins: In these veins of the body of knowledge of
philosophy, they are all actually elements of one or all of the above:
Political Philosophy: What is government?
What should be the role of government?
Is there
a better or best government?
Philosophy of History: What is
history? Is it what really happened or
what we wanted it to
be? Is history
actually journalism? Is there history or
are there “histories”? If there are only
“histories, then is there really “history”?
Is true history a history of events or of ideas and
which is greater?
Philosophy of Science: What is
science? What qualifies something as
being scientific? What
is the scientific method, and who says that is the right
method?
Philosophy of Education: What is education? What is the purpose of education?
Philosophy of Bias – phenomenology – the chance and degree that bias can
be eliminated.
Philosophy or Race, Religion, Culture, Liberalism, Conservatism
There are many other large categories commonly studied.
Minor Philosophies
Philosophy
of ________________ (You insert basically whatever you want)
Philosophy Based on Regions/Time
Frames/Religions:
Western Philosophy:
Eastern:
Ancient Egyptian:
Jewish
Christian
Buddhist
40’s USA – To defeat the one defined enemy (while today often no one
knows who the actual
enemy is)
50’s USA – Prosperity - Conservatism
60’s USA - Opposition to the government/cultural revolution.
Philosophy based on Specific Philosophers/Leaders/Artists:
Plato
Aristotle
Kantian
Hegelian
Husseral/Ponty
- Phenomenology
Jeffersonian/Hamiltonian
Arguments
Marx/Adam
Smith Arguments
Whitman/Emerson/Thoreau
–(American Writers)
Dewey
(American Educator)
John Lennon
(Singer-Song Writer)
Senator
Grassley (Political)
Claude
Debussy (Musician)
Picasso
(Artist)
Traits of Most all Philosophy:
1 Love of Wisdom
2 Seeking Truth
3 Reason
4 Study of Thought
5 Critical Questioning
Open Mindedness
Periods of Philosophy:
1.
Ancient: About 500 BC to 200 AD
–Pre Greek
-Classical Greek: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle
-Hellenistic
-Roman
2. Medieval: Around 200 AD to 1650-ish
-Mostly Catholic Philosophers
(Scholastic)
-Protestant Reformation in the
1500d’s (printing press
invented about 100 years earlier).
3.
Modern: 1650-1900:
Science became more important. It
was no longer always required to connect philosophy to a deity.
4.
Contemporary: 1900 – (2000?):
Contemporary Analytical: More of an analytical focus on what they can
conclude as fact in the physical world.
Contemporary Continental: Focus on freedom, being, meaning, and other
metaphysical concerns.
5.
Next period? (2000-Present). Philosophy after the onset of the internet.
Greek Philosophers
Pre-Greek:
Island of Miletus (500 BC) – Discussions of what the Earth is made up of.
-Atomists: Anaximander, Pythagoras
-Zeno: Paradox of Movement
-Had arguments about infinity
and divisibility
Greeks
-All Greeks believed in fate and
the Devine.
-They had no mind-set of a life without purpose.
-Purpose, fate, and a spiritual dimension all existed a-priori without
question.
Socrates: (No real proof that he actually existed)
-The Socratic Method:
-The unexamined Life not worth
Living.
-Moderation
-Corruption of the Youth,
Sentences to death by his peer. Could
have escaped.
Plato:
-Student of Socrates.
-Wrote the
Dialogues.
-Started the
“academy” which was the first school.
-Practiced
deductive reasoning, which is going from large ideas to small details.
-Believed in
the concept of “forms” The idea = the Form
-Teleology: The purpose of the forms. The purposes are assigned.
-Reality =
the unseen world of ideas and the physical world of things, but the world of
ideas is greater than the world of things.
The unseen world does not decay.
The seen physical world is always in decay.
-Plato Believed
in the concept of a three dimensional person:
The Physical/Mental/Spiritual
-Plato Believed
in the “Divided Line” concept between physical world and spiritual world.
: Seen and unseen.
: Decay and non-decay.
Aristotle:
-Student of
Plato
-Later
started his own school “Lyceum”
-Practiced
inductive reasoning, which is going from small observations to large ideas.
: This turned into the concept
of “experimentation”
: Aristotle believed in
probability in experimentation.
: This turned into the
“Scientific Method” that we still use today.
-Aristotle
was an extreme classifier and labeler.
He invented the “Classification System” for animals.
-Aristotle
named many animals.
-Aristotle
rejected forms.
-Aristotle
believed that worrying about the unseen was a waste of time.
-Truth had to be seen and experienced and lived in the physical world.
-How we lived in the physical world matters – “ethics”.
Alexander (The Great):
-Student of
Aristotle
-Was not
actually Greek – was from Macedonia
-Became a
warrior, and conquered the known world.
-Spread
Greek Culture throughout the world – known as “Hellenistic Culture”.
No comments:
Post a Comment